We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
ARAB HEALTH - INFORMA

Download Mobile App




Events

27 Jan 2025 - 30 Jan 2025
15 Feb 2025 - 17 Feb 2025

Effective Breast-Conserving Surgery Results in Substantial Savings

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 08 Jan 2019
Print article
A new study suggests that if breast-conserving surgery (BCS) re-operation rates can be minimized, considerable funds can be saved.

Researchers at Imperial College London (Imperial; United Kingdom) and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (London, United Kingdom) conducted a study to compare direct patient‐level costs between 153 patients undergoing successful, definitive BCS and 59 patients who necessitated reoperations. Financial data over the 12-month study period were retrieved using patient‐level information and costing systems (PLICS). In addition, a systematic review of health economic analysis was conducted using the quality of health economic studies (QHES) instrument.

The results revealed that the median cost of reoperations after BCS was USD 6,014, representing an additional USD 2,848 per patient compared with BCS without reoperation. The median QHES score was 47, with only two of nine studies scored in the upper QHES quartile (a score at least 75). Costs of initial lumpectomy and reoperation were in the range USD 1,234-11,786 and USD 655-9136, respectively. The study was published on December 19, 2018, in the British Journal of Surgery (BJS).

“High rates of reoperation following breast‐conserving surgery for positive margins are associated with costs to healthcare providers,” concluded lead author Yasmin Grant, PhD, of the Department of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology at Imperial College London, and colleagues. “If these cost estimates are applied nationally, they provide compelling encouragement to seek interventions to minimize re-operation after BCS, which would reduce associated costs.”

One of the root causes for the variability in repeat surgery rates for BCS is the lack of standardization of an acceptable margin width. No nationally or internationally accepted guidelines for an adequate margin width for invasive or noninvasive breast cancer have as yet been established, leading to considerable variability in BCS re-excision rates.

Related Links:
Imperial College London
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
Gold Member
POC Blood Gas Analyzer
Stat Profile Prime Plus
New
Plasma Freezer
iBF125-GX
New
X-ray Diagnostic System
FDX Visionary-A

Print article

Channels

Patient Care

view channel
Image: The portable biosensor platform uses printed electrochemical sensors for the rapid, selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Photo courtesy of AIMPLAS)

Portable Biosensor Platform to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections

Approximately 4 million patients in the European Union acquire healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections each year, with around 37,000 deaths directly resulting from these infections,... Read more

Health IT

view channel
Image: First ever institution-specific model provides significant performance advantage over current population-derived models (Photo courtesy of Mount Sinai)

Machine Learning Model Improves Mortality Risk Prediction for Cardiac Surgery Patients

Machine learning algorithms have been deployed to create predictive models in various medical fields, with some demonstrating improved outcomes compared to their standard-of-care counterparts.... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image: The acoustic pipette uses sound waves to test for biomarkers in blood (Photo courtesy of Patrick Campbell/CU Boulder)

Handheld, Sound-Based Diagnostic System Delivers Bedside Blood Test Results in An Hour

Patients who go to a doctor for a blood test often have to contend with a needle and syringe, followed by a long wait—sometimes hours or even days—for lab results. Scientists have been working hard to... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.