We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
ARAB HEALTH - INFORMA

Download Mobile App




Sterile Gloves Hold No Advantage in the Battle Against SSI

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 16 Aug 2016
Print article
Image: A new study shows no difference in the rate of postoperative surgical site infection outpatient surgical procedures between sterile and nonsterile gloves (Photo courtesy of the Mayo Clinic).
Image: A new study shows no difference in the rate of postoperative surgical site infection outpatient surgical procedures between sterile and nonsterile gloves (Photo courtesy of the Mayo Clinic).
Researchers at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to explore SSI rates and determine whether the use of sterile versus nonsterile gloves in outpatient cutaneous procedures affects the rate of postoperative wound infection. Patients in the studies underwent outpatient cutaneous or mucosal surgical procedures, including Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), repair of a laceration, standard excisions, and tooth extractions.

Overall, 14 studies met eligibility and inclusion criteria, with a total of 12,275 patients who underwent outpatient procedures with sterile or nonsterile gloves, and had follow-up regarding SSI. In all, 228 patients (2.1%) were documented as having postoperative SSI, including 107 of 5,031 patients in the nonsterile glove group (2.1%) and 121 of 6,040 patients in the sterile glove group (2.0%). The study was published on August 3, 2016, in JAMA Dermatology.

“When considering surgical practices and guidelines, multiple factors should be considered, including the potential consequences of deviating from accepted sterile glove use and the potential challenges this could cause from a medico-legal standpoint,” concluded lead author Jerry Brewer, MD, and colleagues. “Patient perception of the sterile technique used should also be considered, in addition to the dexterity that comes from wearing a surgical glove that fits snugly, as opposed to a clean glove that gives the surgeon a different feel.”

“Although the broad use of nonsterile clean gloves may be justified, caution is advised in generalizing this justification to more advanced outpatient surgical procedures that may not pertain to the information summarized in this review and meta-analysis,” advised the authors. “Future study could include whether duration of surgery and complexity of the repair influence postoperative SSI development in the setting of sterile versus nonsterile gloves.”

Gloves were first introduced to surgical practice more than a century ago, mostly for hygiene purposes. After that, gloves were mainly used for other reasons, including the prevention of hand dermatitis. During the past few decades, the use of surgical gloves has become standard practice to prevent postoperative wound infections or SSI. But while non-sterile gloves are cheap, coming in boxes of 100 gloves each, sterile gloves are of higher quality, individually packed, and are more expensive.

Related Links:
Mayo Clinic

New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
Gold Member
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Sample-To-Answer Test
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Cartridge (CE-IVD)
New
Fetal and Maternal Monitor
F9 Series
New
Mattress Replacement System
Carilex DualPlus

Print article

Channels

Critical Care

view channel
Image: This handheld scanner is moved over breast tissue to monitor how well breast cancer tumors respond to chemotherapy or radiation treatment (Photo courtesy of Boston University)

Novel Medical Device Inventions Use Light to Monitor Blood Pressure and Track Cancer Treatment Progress

Traditional blood pressure devices often leave room for human error. To address this, scientists at Boston University (Boston, MA, USA) have developed a new blood pressure monitoring device based on speckle... Read more

Patient Care

view channel
Image: The portable biosensor platform uses printed electrochemical sensors for the rapid, selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Photo courtesy of AIMPLAS)

Portable Biosensor Platform to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections

Approximately 4 million patients in the European Union acquire healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections each year, with around 37,000 deaths directly resulting from these infections,... Read more

Health IT

view channel
Image: First ever institution-specific model provides significant performance advantage over current population-derived models (Photo courtesy of Mount Sinai)

Machine Learning Model Improves Mortality Risk Prediction for Cardiac Surgery Patients

Machine learning algorithms have been deployed to create predictive models in various medical fields, with some demonstrating improved outcomes compared to their standard-of-care counterparts.... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image: The acoustic pipette uses sound waves to test for biomarkers in blood (Photo courtesy of Patrick Campbell/CU Boulder)

Handheld, Sound-Based Diagnostic System Delivers Bedside Blood Test Results in An Hour

Patients who go to a doctor for a blood test often have to contend with a needle and syringe, followed by a long wait—sometimes hours or even days—for lab results. Scientists have been working hard to... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.