We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Events

21 Aug 2026 - 23 Aug 2026
02 Sep 2026 - 04 Sep 2026

Multicenter Study Quantifies Delays in Care for Emergency Department Boarders

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 20 Aug 2026

Emergency department (ED) boarding—the practice of keeping admitted patients in the ED while awaiting an inpatient bed—creates hazardous delays in definitive care. More...

Prolonged transitions expose older and medically complex patients to medication errors, missed assessments, and discharge planning setbacks. Hospitals struggle to maintain patient flow while ensuring timely handoffs to inpatient teams. A new multicenter study now quantifies how long ED boarders wait for inpatient management and highlights wide variation across U.S. hospitals.

Researchers from the University of Michigan and the nationwide Research in Emergency Systems and Quality Using EHRs Network (RESQUE-NET) reported findings published in JAMA on August 17, 2026. The RESQUE-NET team pooled data from 56 hospitals across 17 health systems to measure the time between the end of emergency care and the start of inpatient management for patients boarding in the emergency department (ED). Participating institutions included Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania.

The study defines inpatient management as the assumption of care by hospital teams responsible for medication management, therapy assessments, and discharge planning, even when patients remain physically in the ED. Investigators used a four-hour benchmark to assess timeliness, reflecting a Joint Commission standard that identifies boarding beyond four hours prior to bed transfer as a critical safety issue. The handoff interval was distinguished from total boarding time, which can extend much longer.

Across participating hospitals, 23% of ED boarders waited at least four hours before inpatient teams assumed care. Many patients experienced 12- to 24-hour delays. Prolonged waits were more common at larger hospitals, facilities caring for more Medicaid patients, and teaching sites. Patients over 65 years, those covered by Medicare, and those with higher illness acuity were also more likely to face extended delays. The authors note the analysis is not nationally representative and call for further research.

The findings suggest that tracking ED-to-inpatient handoff times could help assess how hospitals manage inpatient capacity constraints. At U‑M Health’s University Hospital, hospitalist, general internal medicine, and family medicine teams assume care for boarders in the ED, supported by the Michigan Medicine Command Center (M2C2) to optimize bed use.

Beginning in January 2027, hospitals’ electronic health record systems will start sending anonymous ED throughput data to a federal reporting system, with reporting required for all hospitals a year later. Boarding times will be publicly available on the Care Compare site, and by 2030 certain ED measures will influence Medicare payment rates. A bill in Congress seeks additional transparency around bed availability and ED data tracking.

“Hospital boarding in emergency departments is endemic across the U.S. right now. Health systems must have a plan for resourcing clinical teams to keep patients safe while they board. This is especially important for older patients, those with multiple chronic conditions and those taking high-risk medications,” said Alex Janke, M.D., M.Sc., M.H.S., assistant professor of emergency medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School and member of the U‑M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation.

“Risk concentrates at these moments where one clinical team hands a patient to another. Emergency and inpatient teams work on different clocks, and they're doing this under resource constraints. What our data show is that some hospitals consistently manage that transition in under four hours, and others take more than a day, which suggests it comes down to how a hospital organizes the work, not just how full it is. Where this goes well, the work has been assigned, with emergency and inpatient teams given the resources to manage these patients wherever they happen to be,” Janke said.

Related Links
University of Michigan Medical School


Gold Member
Blood Gas Analyzer
i-Check200
Radiology Monitor
MDNC-6121 Barco Nio Color 5.8MP
Medical Adhesive
MED 5570U
Multi-Chamber Washer-Disinfector
WD 390
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: A new oscillating triboelectric nanogenerator developed by Professor Xudong Wang and postdoctoral scholar Pengfei Chen could power a pacemaker for a patient\'s entire life, no batteries needed. (Photo courtesy of Joel Hallberg / UW–Madison)

Heartbeat-Powered Pacemaker Could Eliminate Battery Replacement Surgery

Pacemaker replacement surgeries expose patients to repeated procedural risks and added costs, particularly with leadless intracardiac systems that are difficult to explant once batteries deplete.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.