We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GC Medical Science corp.

Download Mobile App




Speech-Recognition Alone Cannot Sustain Transcription Process

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 09 Aug 2018
While speech recognition (SR) software serves as a valuable tool for annotating clinical notes, it does not appear capable of serving as the sole component of the transcription process, claims a new study.

Researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH; Boston, MA, USA), Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH; Boston, USA), the University of Colorado (Aurora, USA), and other institutions conducted a study to examine the quality of SR-assisted documentation throughout the dictation process. More...
To do so, they collected a random sample of 83 office notes, 75 discharge summaries, and 59 operative notes dictated by 144 physicians using the Nuance Communications Dragon Medical 360 | eScription platform.

They then identified transcription errors in the SR generated document, the medical transcriptionist edited document (MT), and the physician’s signed note (SN). Each document was compared with a criterion standard created from the original audio recording (OA) and the medical record review. Outcomes and measures included error rate; mean errors per document; error frequency by general type (such as deletion), semantic type (such as medication), and clinical significance. The researchers also reviewed variations by physician characteristics, note type, and institution.

The researchers then reviewed the documents at four separate stages (OA, SR, MT, SN), noting the time taken to dictate and review each note. In each stage, error rates involved clinical information in 15.8%, 26.9%, and 25.9% of cases, respectively; 5.7%, 8.9%, and 6.4% were deemed clinically significant. In the 217 clinical notes, 7.4% of the words were incorrectly transcribed by automated SR, but the error rate fell to 0.4% after MT review of the clinical notes, and dropped to just 0.3% after the physician signed off on the notes. The study was published on July 6, 2018, in JAMA Network Open.

Clinical documentation is among the most time-consuming and costly aspects of using an electronic health record (EHR) system. SR technology, the automatic translation of voice into text, has been used for clinical documentation since the 1980s. There are two types of SR systems - front-end SR, in which physicians dictate directly into free-text fields of the electronic health record (HER) and edit them before saving the document, and back-end SR systems, in which the SR text is edited by a professional MT and sent back to the physician for review.

Related Links:
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital
University of Colorado


Gold Member
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Sample-To-Answer Test
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Cartridge (CE-IVD)
Gold Member
STI Test
Vivalytic Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Array
New
Cervical Seal
Omni Lok
New
Critical Care Cart
Avalo
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Critical Care

view channel
Image: the deep tissue in vivo sound printing (DISP) platform, which combines ultrasound with low-temperature–sensitive liposomes loaded with crosslinking agents (Photo courtesy of Elham Davoodi and Wei Gao/Caltech)

New Ultrasound-Guided 3D Printing Technique to Help Fabricate Medical Implants

3D bioprinting technologies hold considerable promise for advancing modern medicine by enabling the production of customized implants, intricate medical devices, and engineered tissues designed to meet... Read more

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: The engine-free, nonlinear, flexible, micro-robotic platform leverages AI to optimize GBM treatment (Photo courtesy of Symphony Robotics)

First-Ever MRI-Steerable Micro-Robotics to Revolutionize Glioblastoma Treatment

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and difficult-to-treat brain cancers. Traditional surgical procedures, such as craniotomies, involve significant invasiveness, requiring large... Read more

Patient Care

view channel
Image: The portable biosensor platform uses printed electrochemical sensors for the rapid, selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Photo courtesy of AIMPLAS)

Portable Biosensor Platform to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections

Approximately 4 million patients in the European Union acquire healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections each year, with around 37,000 deaths directly resulting from these infections,... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.